
No More Fossil Fuels by Joe Brusky via Flick CC
Supply chain emissions are mostly “overlooked” by corporations measuring their operational emissions (known as Scope 1 and 2), leaving a huge question mark about the ability to achieve net zero globally by 2050.
That’s a major problem, as a report from Boston Consulting Group indicates: corporations’ “supply chain Scope 3 emissions are 26 times higher than their operational emissions.” And: “Supply Chain Scope 3 Emissions continue to be overlooked, with only 15% of corporates having set a supply chain emissions target.”
Looking at this another way, 85% of businesses have no commitment to cut supply chain emissions!
That undermines the entire net zero exercise and its timeline because those blind spots drive “significant unreported risks for both investors and corporates.”
The BCG analysis examined the climate disclosures made by more than 23,000 companies through CDP (the non-profit Carbon Disclosure Project) this year, which was slso produced in collaboration with Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
For the average large, listed company, supply chain emissions will be 26 times higher than those generated in operations. The discrepancy is even higher in the retail and apparel sectors, at a ratio of 92:1 tonnes and 47:1 tons respectively.
The only sector in which supply chain emissions are equal to or less than operational emissions is fossil fuels.
“As such, having a robust plan to cut supply chain emissions should be part of any corporate climate strategy,” notes BCG.
The report says its conclusions “highlight that the challenge of effectively measuring Scope 3 emissions is widespread and spans industries,” said Sonya Bhonsle, director of strategic accounts at CDP. “Meaningful strides toward emissions reductions require corporates to evaluate their full supply chain, then raise ambition and take accountability. The first step to driving meaningful change toward a 1.5°C-aligned net zero future begins with disclosure.”
Evaluating the spectrum of all emissions is challenging and might be an impossibility. Unless all facets of the drive to net zero are factored in – and not “overlooked” – net zero cannot be achieved.
But then what is Plan B?